limitedburan

Thanks for the recommendations and comments - I bought it last evening, and am very happy with it. I absolutely love the way the residential house objects (and other urban buildings) are all alligned correctly - it really looks awesome! Nightmare Before Christmas Ps2 Iso. I am currently flying out of Valdez, around the Southcentral area - amazing fun with this add-on now.:smile: As has been said above, I am generally getting brilliant frame rates (30 FPS locked) in the Turbine Duke, Carenado 208, etc, with Opus weather and quite high settings, but at Anchorage, things dropped to 17 FPS, so I will have to look further at manually tweaking this area, Thanks, Raul. Anyone know or tried to use any photoreal scenery with UT Alaska X?

Would there buildings still appear? I ask that because I know they generate (autogen?) buildings differently with this product than their other releases. I believe they use or can use with a config setting vector data to place their buildings so they line up with streets correctly. I don't know enough about it to know if that would matter or not when trying to use photoreal scenery in a UT Alaska area. I'm guessing this still would have to be tied to their bgl's somehow though and is not possible, but just wanted to ask to know for sure. Love it, hard on frames around Anchorage, but other than that it is fantastic. Yes, I struggle alot with Ultimate Alaska X and Aerosoft PANC, It's unusable for me, even FSDT CYVR with Vancouver v3+ and Orbx PNW performs better than that.

Have tried removing all the ground traffic for this aiport, but it still performs like sh.t. When i try PANC with Default scenery It performs excellent. Ancourage isn't exacly the biggest city so I can't understand why I get this bad performance. I hope Orbx SAK will give me better performance than Ultimate Alaska X. Even orbx brisbane and ymml performs alot better so there must be something wrong somewhere. Just trying to avoid making ANOTHER account somewhere. Flight1 is one of the accounts that I consider worth it to have set up.

However, I'm pretty sure you can purchase and install without requiring an account - but you'll lose some of the flexibility for reinstalling, I think you have to keep your install key safe. I never saw this thread originally, and not to harp on an old thread, but Ultimate Alaska is great, in my opinion it's a must have. The impressive thing is the flexibility of the program to set detail in certain areas that might have issues with performance. Heck, you can even turn the whole thing down to a point where it's just the same as having regular UT. Yes, I struggle alot with Ultimate Alaska X and Aerosoft PANC, It's unusable for me, Aerosoft PANC, although decent looking, has totally miserable in performance in my opinion.

You can tweak all you want in the UTAK settings, the problem lies with PANC. Aerosoft PANC is one of the few purchases that I've uninstalled. I actually use a combination of parts of the freeware versions and my own photoreal ground cover made in FS Earth Tiles (which of course isn't able to be shared). Let me tell you, doing my own water mask for Lake Hood was daunting, and it was my first experience with making night and seasonal ground cover. Aerosoft PANC, although decent looking, has totally miserable in performance in my opinion. You can tweak all you want in the UTAK settings, the problem lies with PANC.